This series examines the relationship between electricity, productivity/GDP, well-being, and the role of AI as a new compute-intensive—and therefore energy-intensive—technology.
The goal is to answer two questions:
Why does access to reliable, inexpensive electricity so often accompany jumps in well-being?
Is AI already affecting GDP/productivity, or is the effect still difficult to see—and why?
What AI means in terms of compute, data centers, training vs inference and efficiency—and why demand can keep growing even as hardware improves.
The main bottlenecks: energy, chips, data, talent and regulation.
To turn those limits into physical constraints, the AI datacenter capacity explorer contrasts total power, PUE, slots, accelerator power and rack cooling to identify which bottleneck dominates.
When the question expands from one facility to countries and regions, the global AI ecosystem explorer compares investment, company formation, infrastructure, models, talent and policy capacity with visible coverage, normalization and weights.
AI as an electrical technology
The scale is already material: data centers consumed 415 TWh in 2024, and the IEA projects between 945 and 1,260 TWh by 2030.
2024
415 TWh
1.5% of global electricity
2030 base
945 TWh
2.28× 2024 · slightly above Japan today
2030 high
1,260 TWh
3.04× 2024 · IEA Lift-Off scenario
AI load 2024
~62 TWh
Approximately 15% of the total, using accelerated servers as a proxy for AI workload.
AI-specific 2030
554 TWh
Greenpeace estimate for AI-specific workloads. Its methodology differs from the IEA base scenario.
Typical load
100 MW
Order of magnitude for a typical AI data center. The largest facilities under construction are around 2 GW—roughly twenty times more.
Sources: IEA Energy and AI (2025) for 415 / 945 / 1,260 TWh, the 1.5% share, comparison with Japan and the ~100 MW order of magnitude for a typical AI data center; Greenpeace/Öko-Institut (2025) for 554 TWh of AI-specific load in 2030. Caveat: the 2024 AI share uses accelerated servers as a proxy because there is no perfectly clean physical boundary between AI and non-AI workloads.